Model Information	
Data Set	WORK.BMIEXAMPLE		
Response Variable	WEIGHT1	WEIGHT1	
Number of Response Levels	3		
Model	cumulative logit		
Optimization Technique	Fisher's scoring		

Number of Observations Read	51	
Number of Observations Used	51	

Response Profile	
Ordered
Value	WEIGHT1	Total
Frequency	
1	2	7	
2	1	19	
3	0	25	

Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values.	

Model Convergence Status	
Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.	

Score Test for the Proportional Odds Assumption	
Chi-Square	DF	Pr > ChiSq	
0.7200	2	0.6977	

Model Fit Statistics	
Criterion	Intercept
Only	Intercept
and
Covariates	
AIC	104.971	90.069	
SC	108.835	97.796	
-2 Log L	100.971	82.069	

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0	
Test	Chi-Square	DF	Pr > ChiSq	
Likelihood Ratio	18.9021	2	<.0001	
Score	16.0511	2	0.0003	
Wald	14.6065	2	0.0007	

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates	
Parameter		DF	Estimate	Standard
Error	Wald
Chi-Square	Pr > ChiSq	
Intercept	2	1	-8.4711	1.9061	19.7505	<.0001	
Intercept	1	1	-5.9528	1.6611	12.8432	0.0003	
ENERGYHU		1	0.0390	0.0721	0.2924	0.5887	
TOTFAT		1	0.0543	0.0226	5.7575	0.0164	

Odds Ratio Estimates	
Effect	Point Estimate	95% Wald
Confidence Limits	
ENERGYHU	1.040	0.903	1.197	
TOTFAT	1.056	1.010	1.104	

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses	
Percent Concordant	77.9	Somers' D	0.559	
Percent Discordant	22.0	Gamma	0.560	
Percent Tied	0.1	Tau-a	0.344	
Pairs	783	c	0.780	

Model Information	
Data Set	WORK.BMIEXAMPLE		
Response Variable	WEIGHT1	WEIGHT1	
Number of Response Levels	3		
Model	cumulative logit		
Optimization Technique	Fisher's scoring		

Number of Observations Read	51	
Number of Observations Used	51	

Response Profile	
Ordered
Value	WEIGHT1	Total
Frequency	
1	2	7	
2	1	19	
3	0	25	

Probabilities modeled are cumulated over the lower Ordered Values.	

Model Convergence Status	
Convergence criterion (GCONV=1E-8) satisfied.	

Score Test for the Proportional Odds Assumption	
Chi-Square	DF	Pr > ChiSq	
0.6375	1	0.4246	

Model Fit Statistics	
Criterion	Intercept
Only	Intercept
and
Covariates	
AIC	104.971	94.710	
SC	108.835	100.506	
-2 Log L	100.971	88.710	

Testing Global Null Hypothesis: BETA=0	
Test	Chi-Square	DF	Pr > ChiSq	
Likelihood Ratio	12.2607	1	0.0005	
Score	11.1430	1	0.0008	
Wald	10.2192	1	0.0014	

Analysis of Maximum Likelihood Estimates	
Parameter		DF	Estimate	Standard
Error	Wald
Chi-Square	Pr > ChiSq	
Intercept	2	1	-6.7012	1.6402	16.6927	<.0001	
Intercept	1	1	-4.4525	1.4576	9.3306	0.0023	
ENERGYHU		1	0.1633	0.0511	10.2192	0.0014	

Odds Ratio Estimates	
Effect	Point Estimate	95% Wald
Confidence Limits	
ENERGYHU	1.177	1.065	1.301	

Association of Predicted Probabilities and Observed Responses	
Percent Concordant	72.8	Somers' D	0.458	
Percent Discordant	26.9	Gamma	0.460	
Percent Tied	0.3	Tau-a	0.282	
Pairs	783	c	0.729